Friday, September 27, 2019

Can we have a Conversation about Food Preferences and Work Environment? An outlook from HELSUS survey on Vik campus (UH)

On September 4th, the result of a HELSUS-survey, done at Viikki campus at the University of Helsinki, was posted on the university blog, claiming: In relation to FOOD, many suggested choosing vegetarian or vegan options during lunch and having them as the preferred catering option in meetings and seminars. Humans started eat bone marrow 3.6 mya, and continued with meat. That new diet started an expansion of their brains, and room for new mental faculties. But lurking in the background was the mental fallacies, fooling some (1%) that its dangerous to eat the very food that gave us ahugh brain, and that the production of animal source food has an significant impact on the climate. The response rate was 1.8 %, and a staggering 17 % claimed they could switch vegan alternative, for reasons of sustainability. How can the willingness to abandon real food be 17 times higher at Vik Campus compared to the general population? 9 pages.

Please support the blog via Swish (Sweden) or MobilePay (Finland).

On September 4th, the result of a HELSUS-survey, done at Viikki campus at the University of Helsinki, was posted on the university blog, claiming:
In relation to FOOD, many suggested choosing vegetarian or vegan options during lunch and having them as the preferred catering option in meetings and seminars.
The aim of the survey was to project future diet options to improve sustainability in the workplace. Does that include well-being?

The method used was an inquiry with direct options in the format ‘willingness to …’. The response rate was 1,8%.

A spontaneous reaction: Are there any issues here concerning methodological things like representativeness, validity, and reliability, but also, conceptual stuff about nutrition and sustainability?

Food goes deep with people - it is the glue that holds socio-cultures together. For example, during Christmas, we eat certain foods. Not because it relates to Christianity, but because it relates to the systemic transformation that has been taking place since the start of the current era. But as our rational mind can comprehend, food has been with us longer than that.

The human lineage goes back some six million years, either to what is now Chad or the Tugen Hills (Pickford, 2006), between Lake Victoria, located in Uganda and the source of the river Nile, and Lake Turkana, located mostly in Kenya with its northern tip in Ethiopia. Lake Turkana is is where anthropologists found Nariokotome boy (Homo ergaster/Erectus) (Brown, Harris, Leakey and Walker, 1985).

Ethiopia, on the other hand, is where they found ‘Lucy’ (Australopithecus afarensis) (Johanson and Gray, 1974).

A current study suggests that Lucy’s kind changed their diet some 3.5 million years ago, from plant-based to add animal fats - bone marrow. In the search for the super-nutritious bone marrow, “Lucy’s kind” had to smash stones onto the bones of big dead animals. This 'percussive' behavior changed the form of their hands, and the change of diet probably initiated a reduction of their guts and an expansion of their brains (Aiello and Wheeler, 1995; Mann, 2018; McPherron et al. 2010; Pontzer et al. 2016; Thompson et al. 2019).

~800 000 years later, our genus, Homo, emerged (Villoare et al. 2015).

Soon after, a significant climate change, from Pliocene to Pleistocene, occured (Cohen et al.).

Sometime around this time, its known they ate meat (Gibbons, 2018; Pobiner, 2013; Zaraska, 2016).

The expansion of their brains eventually gave room for new mental faculties - social cognition, symbolic thinking, executive functions, and language (Ambrose, 2010; Coolidge and Wynn, 2018; Pagel, 2017, 2019 ; Pringle, 2016).

With these extended mental abilities, our ancestors baked the first known bread some 14 000 years ago (Arranz-Otaegui et al. 2018), and not long after that, they brewed first known beer (Liu et al., 2018). And despite the lack of nutrients, and for being very time consuming to produce, this plant-based diet was used for ‘special’ occasions. But this change of lifestyle, from fats- and meat consuming hunting and gathering to plant-based eating settlers, took its toll on health, and transformed societies from egalitarian to hierarchical (Kohler et al. 2017; Mummert et al. 2011).

The modern human brain takes 20 % of all the energy we consume, and still crave for animal fats (Ede, 2019).

Ylilauri et al (2019) showed that a diet deficient of eggs and meat increases the probability to suffer from dementia; Finland is topping the Alzheimer's ranking.

White and Hall (2017) showed that production of animal source food in the western heiphere, has little to no impact on the climate. That may be due to the Biogenic Carbon Cycle.

What makes us different from other animals is that we consciously can elaborate scenarios and run them forward time (Gilbert and Wilson, 2007Kaku, 2014).
 
But when we believe that the future is uncertain, we tend to worry about the future, maybe about the climate? Worrying about the future, neuroticism, as well as anxiety and depression, is associated (correlated) with the lack of animal source food (Forestell and Nezlek, 2018; Nezlek, Forestell and Newman, 2018). That may lead to dysrationalia - the inability to think and behave rationally despite adequate intelligence (Stanovich, 2009),

The HELSUS-survey is part of a larger context: “C You in Vik–initiative“ established earlier this year as a joint effort of nine enthusiastic persons working and studying in the campus”, based on the question:
“ How do we make environmentally ‘smart’ practices visible and embed them into our actions at work?”
Long story short. The students’ inspiration for this project originates at the University of Helsingfors new Responsibility and Sustainability program which contains several subcategories: (1) research, teaching, and partnership. (2) campus, (3) financial, (4) cultural, and (5) social. Even so, the key concept is sustainable development.

According to Wikipedia, the English version, Sustainable development originates from the Brundtland report, and can be defined as
“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations”.
Sustainability, the first part of the concept ‘Sustainable development’, refers generally to the capacity for the biosphere and human civilization to coexist, and It’s about systems thinking, which means there are multiple factors at play in the model.

Systems thinking resonates with the movements like ‘the Learning Organization’, coined by famous MIT-professor, Dr. Peter Senge. In 1998, Senge defined a learning organization as:
“a group of people working together to collectively enhance their capacities to create results that they truly care about” (Fulmer and Keys, 1998, p. 35).
Learning is cognitive and social and comes in yet a variety of fashions, including adaptive, meaning coping with existing procedures and culture. Generative learning could, from a conceptual point of view, be seen as a mix of the cognitive blending we call creativity, and explorative thinking/disjunctive reasoning that considers all options (Nickerson, 1998; Stanovich, 2009).

For example, learning the Pythagorean axiom is considered adaptive, because it has already been invented. But Pythagoras (570 – 495 BC) himself used generative learning, that is, explorative thinking and creativity to come up with the infamous formula that describes how to calculate the diagonal of a square by taking the square root of the sums of the squared sides. (Did I get it right, or am I square?)

Another great leap was made by Filippo Brunelleschi’s (1377 – 1446) feat to erect the dome for the roofless Cathedral of Florence. Brunelleschi’s work is said to have kick-started the renaissance - the rebirth of the rational and explorative thinking by people like Pythagoras, that had been suppressed by honor cultures since ~475 AD.

Explorative thinking and creativity were also used by people like (1) Darwin (1809-1882) and Wallas (1823-1913), when they jointly presented the theory of evolution by natural [and sexual] selection 1859, (2), and Marie Curie (1867 – 1934) in her pioneering research on radioactivity.

In parallel with this reborn zeitgeist for explorative thinking, which has led humanity to the global progress most of us can enjoy (Pinker, 2011, 2018), Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772), a Swedish scientist, theologian, and founder of the New Church, followed the trend by claiming he also had experienced revelations - a deeper understanding about how people should prepare for the second coming of Jesus:
Drawing on the passage in Genesis (1:29-31) in which God Institute a vegan diet, Swedenborg said that meat-eating corresponds to the fall from grace in the Garden of Eden and was, therefore, the point of entry of sin and suffering into the world (Phelps, p. 149).
In 1817 the Swedenborgian Church of North America was established,
"and 1845, when the movement toward Swedenborg was in full tide, George Bush, professor of Hebrew and Oriental Literature in the University of the City of New York and long a favorite oracle of the orthodox church, was converted and took the lead of it" (John Humphrey Noyes (1811-1886), Letters: 1867).
In parallel to that, the Temperance societies emerged inspired by John Edgar, professor of theology, and Presbyterian Church of Ireland minister. Sylvester Graham (Graham Crackers; 1794-1851) joined the Temperance movement in 1830 for a few months but then left to focus on promoting a plant-based 'Garden-of-Eden' diet. In 1850 Graham, together with Alcott, William Metcalfe (1788-1862), and Russell Trall, founded the American Vegetarian Society
The meeting was called by William Metcalfe who had led a migration of 40 members of the Bible Christian Church from England to Philadelphia in 1817, all abstainers from flesh foods. By 1830 Sylvester Graham (picture right) and William Alcott MD were also following the meatless diet. Metcalfe soon heard about the formation of the Vegetarian Society in Britain in 1847, and about the new word 'Vegetarian' now being used. He contacted Graham and Alcott and arranged the New York gathering (IVU).
In 1830, William Millet (1782-1849) is said to have started an Adventist movement with a similar ambition, that is, also projecting the second coming of Jesus. And Millet had a date: October 22, 1844. The failure of the prophecy led to the Great Disappointment and the formation of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church (SDAC). Millet's goal-statement was reframed to a starting point.

Seventh Day Adventist Church (SDAC) was formally established in 1863, following the religious zeitgeist to promote a Garden-Eden, plant-based, diet in preparation for the second coming of Jesus.

One of the prominent members of SDAC was a young teenage girl named Ellen G. White (1827-1915). She claimed that meat, milk, and butter were responsible for 'carnal urges' - impure thoughts in men. Another early member, John Harvey Kellogg (1852-1943), developed breakfast cereals as a 'healthy food' (Figure 3). We know the brand because his brother William founded Kellogg's (Wikipedia).

Figure 3. Seventh-Day Adventist church transformed into Loma Linda promoting a 'balanced diet'. The current ad dates 1969.

During the late 1950s, after seeing the spread of cardiovascular disease in the US and other countries, researchers tried to find a cure. In England, Professor John Yudkin (1910-1995) was one of the first to claim a causal relationship between consumption of sugar and other refined carbohydrates, and heart disease; Yudkin also showed that sugar caused metabolic syndrome, which manifests in obesity and type-2 diabetes (Yudkin, 1972/1986/2012).

But because Ancel Keys (1904-2014), the founder of Seven Countries study, got more attention, most of us have been cultivated to believe that these diseases are explained by consumption of saturated fats, things containing cholesterol, and red meat, the so-called diet-heart hypothesis, claimed that sfalse due to methodological issues (Leslie, 2016; Taubes, 2001; Teicholz, 2014).

Why did we get it so wrong?

The explanation lies on our human mind, which easily falls victim of mentala fallacies, for example availability bias (Tversky and Kahneman, 1973), confirmation bias - the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values (Nickerson, 1998), Dysrationalia (Stanovich, 2009), and  groupthink (Janis, 1972; Turner and Pratkanis, 1998).

And with the latest IPCC report, the media took the chance to claim that the committee had given guidelines on diet (we must stop eating meat - for the climate).

As this was false, IPCC took to Twitter to reject that, but as always, it was too late. Soon after, a university in London banned the serving of meat in the cafeteria, and soon after that, the University of Cambridge followed suit.

Current research rejects (1) any association between saturated fats and cardiovascular disease (CVD; Ramsden et al., 2016). Replacing saturated fats with carbohydrates will increase health risks, including CVD (Dehghan et al 2017; Howard et al. 2006).

(2) any claim about a significant influence from production of meat and dairy on the climate. In reality, emissions from agriculture make out a small portion of the emissions (White and Hall, 2017). 

The animal-sourced foods contain nutrients that are hard, if not impossible, to retrieve from plant-based food (Leroy & Cofnas, 2019). Keep that in mind until next time you go shopping for food: B12, Calcium, Carnitine, carnosine, Choline, Creatine, Essential fat omega-3, Iodine, Iron, and remember, they should be consumed together - on the same plate.

The sad story though, we eat more processed food than ever, which should be considered the real issue (Hall et al 2019).

In the HELSUS survey, 6 respondents claimed they would be ‘willing to’ change to a vegan alternative to real food. That’s 17 % of the respondents. Generalizing the result on the population, the 1900 people working at Vik Campus, suggest 323 people are elaborating on doing that switch. Really?

ICAN, a survey performed by AS Nielsen, famous for doing consumer analysis on a global scale, shows that over a long period of time, 95 % of the population choose food based on taste and prize. 4 % ask for local and/or organic. 1 % demand things like the vegan alternative.

How can the willingness to abandon real food be 17 times higher at Vik Campus compared to the general population?

Please support the blog via Swish (Sweden) or MobilePay (Finland).

No comments:

Post a Comment